Think about the last time you read a magazine article about women or watched a news segment featuring women’s issues. Who created that content? Was it designed for women as consumers, or was it produced by women as storytellers? This seemingly simple question opens up a fascinating discussion about how women’s voices have transformed media landscapes, particularly in India, where women communicators have carved out spaces that challenge traditional narratives and create more authentic representations.
Table of Contents
The legacy of women as storytellers
Women have always been communicators. Long before formal media institutions existed, women shared stories through folk songs, oral histories, art forms, and community gatherings. These traditional modes of communication carried wisdom, preserved culture, and built connections across generations. What changed in modern times was not women’s ability to communicate, but rather their access to platforms that could amplify their voices beyond immediate communities.
In the Indian context, women gradually entered professional communication fields despite considerable resistance. They became journalists, writers, photographers, filmmakers, and publishers. But more importantly, they began creating alternative media spaces that reflected their perspectives and addressed issues that mainstream media often overlooked or misrepresented.
Building alternative media ecosystems
The real transformation came when women decided to create their own media platforms rather than simply fitting into existing structures. Organizations like Jagori, established in 1984, became pioneering forces in producing gender-sensitive content. Jagori focused on consciousness raising and awareness building on violence, health, education, and other issues critical for women’s empowerment, producing creative materials on feminist concerns that served women’s groups and development organizations across India.
Similarly, Nirantar, a Delhi-based organization focusing on gender and education, launched initiatives that went beyond traditional media formats. Perhaps their most remarkable creation was Khabar Lahariya, a newspaper started in 2002 that became India’s only rural newspaper written, edited, produced, and distributed entirely by women from disadvantaged communities. Published in various Hindi dialects including Bundeli and Avadhi, this publication covered local political news, crime reports, and social issues from a distinctly feminist perspective.
The Self-Employed Women’s Association (SEWA), founded in 1972, took a different approach by combining media with grassroots organizing. SEWA created newsletters, educational materials, and documentation projects that gave voice to women in the informal economy. These communications helped workers understand their rights, share experiences, and build collective strength for advocacy.
What made these initiatives powerful was their commitment to authentic storytelling. They produced documentaries that captured women’s lived realities, newsletters that addressed practical concerns, and books that challenged dominant narratives. The content wasn’t polished by mainstream media standards, but it was honest, relevant, and deeply connected to the communities it served.
Media for women versus media by women
This brings us to a crucial distinction that often gets blurred in discussions about women and media. There is a fundamental difference between media created for women and media created by women. Understanding this difference helps us recognize why representation behind the camera matters as much as representation in front of it.
Media created for women typically targets women as a consumer demographic. Think of glossy lifestyle magazines, television soap operas, or beauty product advertisements. These platforms certainly address women, but they often reinforce traditional gender roles and commercial interests. The advertising industry has manufactured its own cult of patriarchy, where women remain associated with domestic tasks, beauty standards, and serving others, even when depicting working women.
The problem with much “for women” media is that it doesn’t necessarily reflect women’s diverse experiences or challenge existing power structures. It may entertain or inform, but it rarely empowers or questions the status quo. The content decisions, editorial perspectives, and underlying assumptions often come from male-dominated corporate structures that view women primarily as markets rather than as complex individuals with agency.
Media by women operates differently. When women control the storytelling process, from conception through distribution, the narratives shift. Women communicators bring their lived experiences, their understanding of systemic challenges, and their commitment to authentic representation. They’re more likely to cover issues like workplace discrimination, safety in public spaces, and reproductive rights with nuance rather than sensationalism.
Consider how Khabar Lahariya’s women journalists successfully created discourse around gender issues in rural Bundelkhand by covering stories of violence and atrocities against women with a gender-sensitive perspective. Their reporting wasn’t just about documenting problems but about demanding accountability and social change, even when it meant putting themselves at risk.
The impact of gender-sensitive storytelling
When women create media, they tend to portray women not as victims or objects, but as individuals with complexity, agency, and diverse experiences. This matters because media representations play an important role in producing sociocultural pressures and shaping public perceptions about gender roles and stereotypes.
Gender-sensitive media challenges the typical narratives we see in mainstream platforms. Instead of focusing exclusively on beauty, marriage, and domesticity, it addresses education, economic independence, political participation, and social justice. It shows women in leadership roles, women making difficult choices, women supporting each other, and women challenging oppressive systems.
The language used in women-created media also differs significantly. Rather than sensationalizing violence against women or using terms that trivialize serious crimes, gender-sensitive reporting uses appropriate language and imagery that respects survivors and holds perpetrators accountable without romanticizing or trivializing the crimes.
Challenges and continuing struggles
Despite these pioneering efforts, women communicators face significant barriers. Research shows that women hold only about 15% of leadership positions in Indian media organizations, with even lower percentages in newspapers. When women do work in media, they’re often assigned “soft” beats like lifestyle and entertainment, while men dominate coverage of politics, economics, and national security.
This structural inequality affects what stories get told and how they’re told. When newsrooms lack diverse voices in decision-making positions, certain perspectives and experiences remain marginalized. The same research found that men wrote about 75% of newspaper articles and occupied over 80% of television debate panel slots, creating an echo chamber that reinforces particular worldviews while excluding others.
The digital revolution and new possibilities
Digital platforms have opened new avenues for women communicators. Organizations that once produced print newsletters can now reach global audiences through websites and social media. Khabar Lahariya’s shift to digital video in 2016 dramatically expanded its reach beyond the 6,000 print copies to millions of online viewers. The documentary about their work, “Writing with Fire,” even received an Oscar nomination, bringing international attention to their gender-sensitive journalism.
Social media has enabled individual women communicators to build audiences without needing institutional support. Bloggers, podcasters, and video creators produce content addressing everything from body positivity to workplace rights to political analysis. These platforms allow for more diverse voices and perspectives than traditional media gatekeepers typically permit.
However, digital spaces also present new challenges. Women communicators online frequently face harassment, trolling, and threats that attempt to silence them. The same tools that amplify voices can also amplify abuse, creating hostile environments that discourage participation.
Why representation behind the camera matters
The distinction between media for women and media by women ultimately comes down to who controls the narrative. When women are merely subjects or audiences, their portrayal depends on others’ perceptions and agendas. When women are creators, editors, and decision-makers, they can tell their own stories with authenticity and complexity.
This doesn’t mean that only women can create good content about women, or that all women-created content is inherently better. Rather, it recognizes that diverse perspectives in media creation lead to richer, more accurate, and more inclusive representations. Organizations like Jagori, Nirantar, and SEWA demonstrated that when women control media platforms, they produce content that serves communities rather than just markets, that challenges rather than reinforces stereotypes, and that empowers rather than merely entertains.
The work of women communicators in creating gender-sensitive media continues to evolve. Each generation builds on the foundations laid by pioneers who insisted that women’s voices deserve platforms, that women’s experiences merit serious attention, and that women’s perspectives enrich public discourse. Their legacy reminds us that representation matters not just in what we see on screen, but in who gets to shape those images and tell those stories.
What do you think? How has media created by women influenced your understanding of gender issues differently than mainstream media? What changes would you like to see in how media organizations prioritize diverse voices in their storytelling?
References
- https://www.jagori.org/
- https://thebetterindia.com/1804/jagori-awakening-women/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khabar_Lahariya
- https://www.civilsocietyonline.com/gender/my-life-changed-after-i-joined-the-sewa-union/
- https://indiafoundation.in/articles-and-commentaries/women-in-indian-media/
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/01968599221096645
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10218532/
- https://www.newslaundry.com/2020/02/23/heres-how-to-depict-gender-violence-sensitively-indian-media-take-a-cue
- https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/gender-representation-in-indian-newsrooms/
Leave a Reply