The Evolutionary Journey of Corporate Social Responsibility in India and Globally

The idea that businesses owe something to the society they operate in is not new. But what began as scattered acts of charity by wealthy industrialists in the 1800s has transformed, over nearly two centuries, into a globally recognized framework of corporate accountability. Today, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) sits at the intersection of business strategy, ethics, law, and public policy. Tracing how CSR evolved – both globally and in India – reveals a great deal about how our expectations of corporations have changed, and why that matters now more than ever.

What CSR actually means 🔗

Before diving into history, it helps to be clear on what CSR means at its core. At its most basic level, CSR is a manifestation of a business’s recognition of a duty to the world – a form of self-regulation aimed at being socially accountable. This includes everything from improving working conditions and reducing environmental impact to supporting community development and ethical governance. The scope has expanded dramatically over time, but the underlying idea remains consistent: corporations are not islands, and their decisions affect real people.

The earliest roots: philanthropy in the industrial age 🔗

The roots of CSR stretch back to the late 1800s, when the rise of large-scale industry came with deeply troubling working conditions. In response, some of the wealthiest industrialists of the era – figures like Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller – began engaging in charitable giving. Carnegie championed the Gospel of Wealth, challenging the wealthy to support social causes, while Rockefeller donated more than half a billion dollars over his lifetime. These were largely personal acts of conscience – driven by faith, public image, or moral conviction – rather than any structured corporate obligation.

Faith-based organizations also played a quiet but significant role. As far back as the 18th century, religious groups refused to invest in industries like tobacco, liquor, and the slave trade because these conflicted with their values. This practice of values-aligned investing was one of the earliest expressions of what we now call socially responsible business behavior.

It is important to note, however, that during this period, the idea of businesses having formal responsibilities beyond profit maximization was not mainstream. The notion was out of favor among most politicians and business leaders of the day, though it was beginning to gain traction among academics and social critics.

The 1950s: CSR gets a name and a framework 🔗

The term “Corporate Social Responsibility” as a distinct concept is generally traced to 1953, when American economist Howard R. Bowen – widely considered the father of CSR – published Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. In this landmark work, Bowen identified the considerable power corporations held over society and argued that businesspeople had an obligation to pursue policies aligned with the common good, not just shareholder returns. This was a pivotal moment: it connected corporate responsibility to society as a formal idea, giving academics and business thinkers a shared vocabulary to build upon.

This period also saw a post-war shift in how corporations understood their place in society. After World War II, executives experienced new pressures to serve as a social force for good, shaped by the growing influence of unions, the threat of communism, and public unease about the concentration of corporate power. Business’s contribution to the war effort had already reinforced the idea that private enterprise carries civic duties.

1970s-1980s: CSR becomes a structured concept 🔗

Through the 1970s and 1980s, CSR moved from philosophical debate into more formal corporate practice. Business adoption of CSR continued steadily and became more important in the 1980s due to greater deregulation, which pushed corporations to engage in more self-regulation and take responsibility for the social impact of their operations. During this period, dedicated CSR departments began appearing within large companies.

The most significant intellectual contribution of this era came from scholar Archie B. Carroll. In 1979, Carroll proposed a four-part definition of CSR that he later visualized as a pyramid in 1991. Carroll defined CSR as encompassing the economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary (philanthropic) expectations that society has of organizations at a given point in time. The pyramid placed economic responsibilities at the base – because a company must first be profitable to survive – followed by legal compliance, ethical conduct, and finally philanthropic activities at the top. Crucially, the pyramid was not meant to be read sequentially but as an integrated whole – businesses were expected to address all four responsibilities simultaneously.

Carroll’s framework brought much-needed clarity to a field that had long struggled with inconsistent definitions. Its simplicity made it widely adopted in business education and corporate governance, and it remains one of the most referenced CSR models in the world.

1990s: globalization expands the scope of CSR 🔗

The 1990s marked a turning point in which CSR began to transcend national borders. Increasing globalization was instrumental in widening the scope of CSR and laid the foundation for how we understand it today. International agreements – including the adoption of Agenda 21 and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change – brought environmental concerns to the forefront of corporate thinking for the first time.

R. Edward Freeman’s 1984 book Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, followed by the UN’s 1987 report Our Common Future, helped integrate CSR into strategic planning processes across industries. The concept of the Triple Bottom Line – measuring a company’s social, environmental, and economic performance together – also emerged in this decade, giving corporations a practical lens through which to evaluate their broader impact.

2000s to present: from voluntary to strategic 🔗

As globalization accelerated in the 2000s and 2010s, businesses faced growing pressure to improve their environmental footprint, labor practices, and ethical governance. Two major global frameworks helped standardize expectations: the UN Global Compact, launched in 2000 with ten principles on human rights, labor, environment, and anti-corruption, and the ISO 26000 standard, released in 2010, offering guidance on socially responsible policies.

The dot-com crash and the 2008 financial crisis both brought corporate ethics back into public conversation with urgency. In 2005, the term Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) was coined, signaling a new era in which investors, not just consumers, would hold corporations accountable for their social and environmental conduct. By 2015, the creation of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) gave companies a shared global roadmap, with CSR programs increasingly designed around all 17 goals – from climate action to gender equality.

CSR in India: a tradition older than the term itself 🔗

India’s relationship with corporate social responsibility has roots that predate the modern term by centuries. Ancient texts like the Rigveda mention sharing wealth with the poor, while Manu Smriti instructs that the means of acquiring wealth must align with the principles of dharma – moral righteousness. Religious institutions, through temple trusts, waqfs, gurudwaras, and churches, were historically the primary vehicles for social welfare in India.

In more recent history, CSR in India is not a new phenomenon – it is implicitly rooted in traditional values, customs, and the ideals of charismatic leaders. The philanthropic practices of major Indian business families – many driven by their own religious and cultural values – built schools, hospitals, and research institutions long before any legal obligation existed.

Gandhi’s trusteeship model: a moral framework for business 🔗

The most significant intellectual contribution to CSR thinking in India came from Mahatma Gandhi. During the independence movement, Gandhi proposed the concept of trusteeship – a socio-economic philosophy rooted in the belief that wealth ultimately belongs to society. Under trusteeship, a person voluntarily surrenders their surplus wealth and holds it in trust for the welfare of the poor. Gandhi argued that industrialists and wealthy individuals were not owners of their wealth in an absolute sense, but trustees – morally bound to use it for the public good.

During the freedom struggle, Gandhi proposed the trusteeship model, under which business tycoons would understand their responsibility towards society and contribute through their wealth. His influence was considerable: under his guidance, business houses established trusts for schools, colleges, and scientific institutions, and involved themselves in causes like the abolition of untouchability and rural development. The founder of the Tata Group, JRD Tata, was notably shaped by Gandhi’s trusteeship philosophy, building it into the culture of one of India’s most prominent conglomerates.

Post-independence India: state-driven development and the private sector 🔗

After Independence in 1947, the Indian state took center stage in development. With the rise of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), the private sector took a backseat, and the public sector became a key driver of development. The limited effectiveness of state-led development, however, gradually shifted expectations back toward the private sector.

The economic liberalization of 1991 was a turning point. Liberalization helped Indian companies grow rapidly, increasing their willingness to contribute toward social causes. Companies started getting involved in CSR programs like building schools and hospitals, empowering rural youth through vocational training, and organizing health camps. However, CSR still remained largely voluntary and philanthropic in character, driven by the personal values of business families rather than any systemic corporate policy.

The Companies Act, 2013: India makes CSR mandatory 🔗

The most transformative moment in Indian CSR history came on 29 August 2013, when the Companies Act, 2013 replaced the previous Companies Act of 1956, introducing a landmark provision under Section 135. This made India the first country in the world to legally mandate CSR spending for eligible corporations.

Under Section 135, all firms with a net worth above ₹500 crore, turnover over ₹1,000 crore, or net profit over ₹5 crore are required to spend at least 2% of their average net profits from the preceding three years on CSR activities, and must constitute a Board-level CSR Committee to oversee this spending. Companies are also required to report their CSR initiatives publicly, introducing a new era of corporate transparency and accountability in India.

The areas eligible for CSR spending – listed in Schedule VII of the Act – include education, poverty alleviation, gender equality, environmental sustainability, and hunger relief. This shift from voluntary to mandatory CSR, while rooted in traditional values, was accelerated by globalization and growing socio-economic inequality that the state alone could not address.

The global conversation around CSR grew significantly with India’s legal mandate, as it demonstrated that governments could legislate corporate social responsibility rather than simply encourage it. It was followed internationally by the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement and the UN SDGs, both of which deepened the connection between corporate activity and global social outcomes.

From charity to strategy: the big shift 🔗

Looking at CSR’s full arc – from Carnegie’s personal philanthropy to India’s legal mandate and the UN’s SDGs – one clear shift stands out. CSR has moved from being a discretionary, personality-driven act of goodwill to a structured, strategic, and increasingly legally enforced responsibility. By the 2000s, CSR had become embedded in corporate strategy and governance, supported by global frameworks, professional associations, and formalized reporting standards.

Today, companies craft their CSR programs around global frameworks, stakeholder expectations, and measurable social outcomes. Consumers, investors, and regulators alike hold corporations to a higher standard than ever before. As improving technology allows for greater corporate transparency and scrutiny, the incentive to be socially responsible will continue to grow. CSR is no longer just good ethics – in many contexts, it is good business.

What do you think? Has making CSR legally mandatory in India – as done through the Companies Act, 2013 – genuinely transformed corporate behavior, or has it reduced a moral commitment to a compliance exercise? And as CSR continues to evolve globally, do you think businesses should have a greater say in defining what “social responsibility” means for their specific industries?

References

1. https://everfi.com/blog/community-engagement/csr-history/
2. https://www.ecolytics.io/blog/evolution-of-csr
3. https://accp.org/resources/csr-resources/accp-insights-blog/corporate-social-responsibility-brief-history/
4. https://www.aom.org/today/the-evolution-of-corporate-social-responsibility/
5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6
7. https://strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/carrolls-csr-pyramid/
8. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/
9. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
10. https://egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/92306/1/Unit-9.pdf
11. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13520-021-00121-2
12. https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2023-0253.pdf
13. https://nationalcsrnetwork.in/history-of-csr-in-india/
14. https://csrcfe.org/about-csr-in-india-public-policy/
15. https://www.satellinstitute.org/whitepapers/a-history-of-corporate-social-responsibility-concepts-and-practices