In journalism, your intro is your first – and often only – chance to grab a reader’s attention. Unlike an essay introduction that gradually builds toward a thesis, a news intro (also called a lead or lede) gets straight to the point. It delivers the most critical piece of information right away. If it fails, the reader moves on. If it succeeds, it pulls the reader into the rest of the story. That’s the power and the pressure of writing a good intro.
Table of Contents
- What exactly is a news intro?
- The 5Ws + 1H: the building blocks of every intro
- Types of news intros
- The summary lead
- The single-item lead
- The delayed-identification lead
- The feature lead (or soft lead)
- What makes a good intro?
- Brevity
- Active voice
- Specificity
- Newsworthiness
- The intro sets the tone
- Common mistakes to avoid
- Burying the lead
- The “duh” lead
- The question lead
- The attribution lead
- The quote lead
- Overloading the intro
- The ABCs of intro writing
- Why mastering intros matters
What exactly is a news intro?
A news intro is the opening paragraph of a story. It is typically one sentence – sometimes two – and it summarises the most important information the reader needs to know. The intro tells the reader what the story is about and, just as importantly, why they should care.
The word “lede” is a deliberate misspelling of “lead,” dating back to the era of printing presses when the metal lead was used for typesetting. The alternate spelling helped newsroom workers avoid confusion between the two terms. Today, “lead” and “lede” are used interchangeably in journalism.
Here’s the key distinction: a news intro is not an academic introduction. In an essay, you ease the reader in with context and background before arriving at your main point. In journalism, you do the opposite. You start with the main point. The background comes later. This is the foundation of the inverted pyramid structure – you put the most newsworthy information at the top and the least essential details at the bottom.
The 5Ws + 1H: the building blocks of every intro
Before writing a single word, a journalist needs to answer six fundamental questions about the story: Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How. These are known as the 5Ws and 1H, and they form the skeleton of every news intro.
Not all six elements need to appear in the intro. In fact, trying to cram all of them into one sentence is a common beginner’s mistake. A strong intro typically addresses three or four of the most important elements and leaves the rest for subsequent paragraphs. The reporter’s job is to decide which elements carry the most news value for a particular story.
For example, consider a story about a fire that destroyed a house. The “what” (a fire destroyed a house) and the “where” (on Main Street) might be most important for the intro. The “who” (the fire department’s response team) and the “how” (an electrical short circuit) can follow in later paragraphs. The trick is to rank the 5Ws + 1H by newsworthiness and lead with the strongest element.
Types of news intros
Not every story calls for the same kind of opening. Journalists have developed several types of intros to suit different stories, tones, and audiences. Understanding these types is essential for any writer who wants to match their intro to the nature of the story being told.
The summary lead
This is the most common type of intro in journalism. A summary lead gives readers a concise overview of the story in a single sentence. It packs in the key facts – usually the most important of the 5Ws + 1H – and gets straight to the heart of the matter. According to journalism educators, there are three main types of news leads: the basic news lead, the summary lead, and the delayed-identification lead.
A summary lead works best for hard news stories – breaking events, policy announcements, crime reports – where the reader’s primary need is to know what happened. For instance: “A 6.2-magnitude earthquake struck central Turkey early Tuesday, killing at least 14 people and damaging hundreds of buildings, according to government officials.” That single sentence answers who was affected, what happened, when, where, and who confirmed it.
The single-item lead
This is a variation of the summary lead that focuses on just one or two elements instead of trying to cover multiple facts. The goal is to deliver a sharper, more focused punch. For instance, when the Philadelphia Phillies won the 2008 World Series, a wire service opened simply with: the Phillies are World Champions again. One fact. Maximum impact. This type of intro works when a single piece of information is so significant that it doesn’t need supporting details to make the reader pay attention.
The delayed-identification lead
In a delayed-identification lead, the person at the centre of the story is not named in the first paragraph. Instead, they are described by an identifier – their occupation, age, city of residence, or role. The actual name appears in the second or third paragraph. This approach works when the person’s identity is less important than what happened to them. A George Mason University writing guide emphasises that all information in news stories must be attributed to its source, and the lede should present the most significant information first – which isn’t always a name.
For example: “A 34-year-old Kolkata shopkeeper was arrested on Tuesday for allegedly running an illegal lending operation from his store.” Here, the action matters more than the name. The person’s identity can come later.
The feature lead (or soft lead)
Not every story is breaking news. For longer features, profiles, or investigative pieces, a feature lead – also called an anecdotal or delayed lead – can be more effective. This type of intro uses a scene, a story, or a vivid image to hook the reader emotionally before getting to the hard facts.
However, a feature lead comes with an important rule: it must be followed by a nut graf (also spelled “nut graph”), usually by the second or third paragraph. The nut graf summarises the 5Ws + 1H and explains what the story is really about. The Poynter Institute describes the nut graf as the paragraph that contains the essential theme of the story. Without it, a feature lead is just a pretty anecdote with no direction.
What makes a good intro?
Knowing the types of intros is only half the battle. The real skill lies in execution. Several principles separate a strong intro from a weak one.
Brevity
A good intro is short. As the Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL) notes, leads are generally 25 to 30 words long and should rarely exceed 40 words. Readers won’t wait around for you to get to the point. One sentence is ideal. Two is the absolute maximum for a hard news lead.
Active voice
Strong verbs written in the active voice make intros lively and direct. Passive constructions sound dull and often leave out critical information – like who performed the action. “The budget was approved” is weaker and less informative than “The city council approved a $5 million budget.” Active voice adds clarity and energy.
Specificity
Vague intros kill reader interest. Instead of writing “a lot of people were affected,” specify the number. Instead of “an incident occurred,” state what happened. Concrete details make a story feel real and trustworthy. The more specific your intro, the more credible it sounds.
Newsworthiness
Your intro must highlight the most newsworthy aspect of the story. Factors like timeliness, proximity, impact, prominence, and conflict all influence what belongs in the opening line. A story about a local school’s funding cut is more newsworthy than a routine board meeting – so the funding cut should lead, not the meeting itself.
The intro sets the tone
Beyond conveying facts, your intro establishes the mood and direction of the entire article. A hard-hitting summary lead sets a fast, serious tone that tells the reader this is urgent news. A slow, descriptive feature lead tells the reader they’re about to experience a narrative. The reader takes cues from the intro to decide how to engage with the rest of the piece.
This is why intro writing is often considered a test of how well a journalist understands their own story. If you cannot write a clear, compelling intro, it may be a sign that you haven’t fully identified the story’s core. The intro forces you to distil interviews, research, and complex events into a single, focused statement.
Common mistakes to avoid
Even experienced journalists sometimes fall into intro-writing traps. Here are the most common mistakes beginners should watch out for.
Burying the lead
This happens when the most important information is hidden in the third or fourth paragraph instead of being presented upfront. The concept of “burying the lead” is the single most common criticism in newsrooms. If your reader has to dig through background details to find out what actually happened, your intro has failed.
The “duh” lead
This is an intro that tells the reader something obvious and not newsworthy. For example: “The City Council held a meeting at City Hall on Monday night.” Of course they did – that’s what city councils do. The news is what happened at the meeting. New writers often fall into this trap because of their essay-writing habits, where introductory context comes before the main point.
The question lead
Starting a news story with a question (“Do you think textbooks are too expensive?”) is generally considered a weak choice. Readers pick up a news story to learn something, not to be quizzed. It’s also a somewhat lazy approach – instead of stating the news, you’re asking the reader to guess at it.
The attribution lead
This mistake occurs when a writer begins the intro with the source of information rather than the information itself. For example: “The mayor told the audience Tuesday that a new stadium will be built next year.” A better version flips the sentence: “A new stadium will be built next year, the mayor announced Tuesday.” The news – the stadium – should come first. The source is important but secondary.
The quote lead
Opening with a direct quote might seem dramatic, but it’s risky. A quote lead drops readers into the middle of a conversation without context. Most quotes need an introduction to make sense, and very few quotes are compelling enough to launch an entire story on their own.
Overloading the intro
Trying to stuff all six of the 5Ws + 1H into one sentence creates a clunky, unreadable paragraph. A good intro includes the three or four most important elements and saves the rest for later. As many journalism instructors advise, one common mistake is trying to put too much into a single lead.
The ABCs of intro writing
A useful mnemonic to remember when writing intros is the ABCs of journalism: Accuracy, Brevity, and Clarity. Every intro you write should pass this three-part test.
Accuracy means every fact in your intro is verified and attributed. An intro is a promise to the reader – if you state something in the opening line, you must be able to back it up in the rest of the story. Getting facts wrong in the intro destroys credibility instantly.
Brevity means keeping your intro tight and free of unnecessary words. Watch for redundancies like “2 p.m. in the afternoon” or “completely destroyed.” Every word in a news intro must earn its place.
Clarity means using simple, straightforward language. Avoid jargon, technical terms, or flowery language. The best intros use strong nouns and verbs. Adjectives and adverbs should be kept to a minimum. If a 15-year-old reader can’t understand your intro, it probably needs rewriting.
Why mastering intros matters
In the age of digital media, the importance of a good intro has only grown. Readers scroll through dozens of headlines and opening lines every day. They make split-second decisions about what to read and what to skip. A weak intro doesn’t just lose one reader – it loses every reader who encounters it.
For journalists, the intro is also a discipline. Writing one forces you to identify the single most important thing about your story. It forces you to think about your audience, your angle, and your news values – all before you’ve even started the second paragraph. The ability to craft a clear, engaging intro is one of the most fundamental skills in print journalism. It is what separates a story that gets read from one that gets ignored.
What do you think? What was the last news intro that made you stop scrolling and actually read the full article – and what about it caught your attention?
References
- https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/journalism_and_journalistic_writing/writing_leads.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_style
- https://nmu.edu/writingcenter/writing-leads
- https://pressbooks.pub/introjournalism/chapter/chapter-8-leads/
- https://writingcenter.gmu.edu/writing-resources/different-genres/news-writing-fundamentals
- https://pressbooks.palomar.edu/introtojournalism/chapter/chapter-7-basics-of-writing/
- https://spscc.pressbooks.pub/introtojournalism/chapter/chapter-8-leads/
Leave a Reply